| City
of Chicago Challenged
Westly v. Picur, 205 Ill.App.3d
270, 562 N.E.2d 1025, 150 Ill.Dec. 222 (Ill.App. 1 Dist.,
Oct 10, 1990) (NO. 1-88-3412). Challenge to City of
Chicago practice of shifting expenditures among budget
items without obtaining advance City Council Approval
for change.
Corrupt
Investment of Public Funds
Deposit of County moneys
in noninterest bearing accounts:
Chabraja v. Martwick, 248 Ill.App.3d
995, 618 N.E.2d 800, 188 Ill.Dec. 230, 85 Ed. Law Rep.
175 (Ill.App. 1 Dist., Jun 25, 1993) (NO. 1-92-0078)
McKay v. Kusper, 252 Ill.App.3d
450, 624 N.E.2d 1140, 191 Ill.Dec. 762 (Ill.App. 1 Dist.,
Mar 29, 1993) (NO. 1-91-0797, 1-91-3062)
State Treasurer's
investment of $30+ million in exchange for $2 million
in personal conduit loans.
Ryan v. Cosentino, 793
F.Supp. 822 (N.D.Ill., Jun 05, 1992) (NO. 91 C 3725).
Confirmation of taxpayers’ ability to bring derivative
action for State against wrongdoers, demand refusal
discussed, joinder of State as nominal defendant. One
State’s claim to bar 11th Amendment.
Ryan v. Cosentino, 776 F.Supp.
386 (N.D.Ill., Oct 04, 1991) (NO. 91 C 3725). Taxpayer
standing acknowledged, 11th Amendment bars
claims against State as a real defendant. Removal procedure
under FIRREA.
State
Income Tax Discrimination
Commerce clause challenge
to State income tax discrimination against bond interest
on other states' bonds:
Shaper v. Tracy, 76 Ohio St.3d
241, 667 N.E.2d 368 (Ohio, Aug 07, 1996) (NO. 95-389,
21869)
Shaper v. Tracy, 73 Ohio St.3d
1211, 654 N.E.2d 1268 (Ohio, Oct 11, 1995) (NO. 95-389,
8855)
Shaper v. Tracy, 71 Ohio St.3d
1428, 642 N.E.2d 636 (Table) (Ohio, Dec 14, 1994) (NO.
94-2439)
Shaper v. Tracy, 97 Ohio App.3d
760, 647 N.E.2d 550 (Ohio App. 10 Dist., Franklin County,
Sep 29, 1994) (NO. 94APE01-32)
Taxpayer
Derivative Case
Case over omitted sewer
and water charges to tax-exempt entities:
Baksinski v. Northwestern
University, 231 Ill.App.3d 7, 595 N.E.2d 1106, 172
Ill.Dec. 436 (Ill.App. 1 Dist., May 21, 1992) (NO. 1-90-3180)
Top
of Page
|
