Krislov Law

Print Email

Home>News & Events

News and Events

Category:

Results: 66 Article(s) Found.

Victory for Institutional and Individual Investors

In an important decision for investor protection and recoveries, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirms certification of class to proceed for DVI stock and notes purchasers against auditors and Directors and Officers.

U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Injunction

Consumer Victory: The United States Supreme Court vacates injunction against consumers that barred pursuit of class claims.

Ryan v. City of Chicago

148 Ill.App.3d 638 (1st Dist. 1986) and 274 Ill.App.3d 483 (1st Dist. 1995) (recovered over $32 million cash, $80 million total benefits, and fundamentally improved the handling of City pension tax levies, ending the City’s illegal use of pension tax levies for its own benefit).

Krislov v. Rednour

In the widely cited Krislov v. Rednour, Mr. Krislov successfully attacked Illinois’ ballot petition procedures that had previously prevented non-organization candidates from getting on the ballot.

In re Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum

725 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir.1984) (establishing invalidity of subpoenas issued by U.S. Attorneys without Grand Jury authorization).

Shaper v. Tracy

97 Ohio App.3d 760 (1994), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 274 (1995) and 76 Ohio St. 3d 241, 667 N.E. 2d 368 (1996) (dormant Commerce Clause challenge to discriminatory state income taxation of only foreign-state municipal income).

Veterans Legal Defense Fund v Schwartz

Veterans Legal Defense Fund v. Schwartz, 330 F.3d 937 (7th Cir. 2003) (Veterans’ right to statutory preferential hiring for state job openings).

Brody v. Finch Univ. Chicago Medical School

After trial on the merits, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s finding that an enforceable contract existed between students and the medical school and that the medical school breached contract; and that the medical school’s conduct implicated consumer protection concerns under Illinois’ Consumer Fraud Act.

Zazove v. Pelikan, Inc.

Zazove v. Pelikan, Inc., 326 Ill.App.3d 798, 761 N.E.2d 256 (1st Dist. 2001) (establishing Illinois jurisdiction over foreign producer of consumer products for consumer claims under stream of commerce concept.)

Ryan v. Gifford (Maxim Corporate Backdating)

In Delaware chancery litigation over option backdating, firm achieved landmark settlement, obtaining over $38 million in cash, repricing and repayments, plus corporate governance that affects both legitimate option grant and exercise practices, with unique transparency provisions to ensure that company’s financial statements will reflect what actually occurs.

Krislov Law

20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 1350
Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.606.0500 | Fax: 312.606.0207
Email: mail@krislovlaw.com

Photography by Ian Korer

Website Design and Website Development by Americaneagle.com