Stinnette v. Fisher & Shapiro: Krislov Law successfully objected to inadequate settlement

Stinnette v. Fisher & Shapiro:  Krislov Law successfully objected to inadequate settlement proposed by competing class plaintiff and defendant Fisher & Shapiro, which would have provided nominal damages under the FDCPA in exchange for a broad release of all viable claims.

See attached February 22, 2012 Orders:

Order denying motion for preliminary approval of settlement

Order denying motion to intervene

 

 

 

Back